Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
write an essay Reflecting about your experiences in the study by answering the
write an essay Reflecting about your experiences in the study by answering the following questions. Please refrain from sharing your experiences with other students, especially those who have not yet participated, as this could contribute to research bias. Do not email the researchers of the studies you participate in about these questions. You need to answer them on your own to the best of your ability.
Do you think the study you participated in met ethical standards for research? Explain why or why not. (2 point).
Tell us about your experiences with participating in sona this semester. What did you like most? What did you like least? Explain your answer. (3 points)
These are the study Questions (besides these questions I was asked my age, gender, whether i was born in the US or not, what is my native country, how long I have been leaving in the US, and some other ethnicity questions).
Which terms do you believe go into a definition of consent? (Check all that apply)
Freely Given
Reversible
Informed
Enthusiastic
Specific
Shared sexual history (past sexual encounter)
Did not say “stop”
Being in a relationship (not married)
Flirting
Provocative attire
Married
In a comprehensive definition of consent, the following terms typically apply:
Freely Given
Informed
Enthusiastic
Specific
Did not say “stop”
Consent should be freely given without any form of coercion or pressure, informed meaning both parties understand what they are agreeing to, enthusiastic indicating active willingness, specific to the particular activity or encounter, and the absence of a “stop” indicating a clear lack of consent.
The other terms such as reversible, shared sexual history, being in a relationship, flirting, provocative attire, and being married are not necessarily indicative of consent on their own and can vary greatly depending on the context.
!
Terry and Jean are in a new sexual relationship. Things are going very well and Terry is particularly impressed with Jean’s performance in bed. Terry has been bragging to friends about Jean and wants to provide evidence. So, Terry hides a video camera in the bedroom and video records them having sex. Jean is unaware of the camera. How would you describe the encounter? (check all that apply)
Consensual
Legal
Ethical
Nonconsensual
Illegal
Unethical
This content may violate our usage policies.
Based on the scenario provided:
Consensual: No, because Jean is unaware of the camera recording their sexual encounter.
Legal: It depends on the jurisdiction, but in many places, recording someone’s intimate activities without their consent is illegal.
Ethical: No, because Terry is violating Jean’s privacy and autonomy by recording the encounter without her knowledge or consent.
Nonconsensual: Yes, because Jean has not consented to being recorded.
Illegal: Yes, in many jurisdictions, recording someone’s intimate activities without their consent is illegal.
Unethical: Yes, because Terry is violating Jean’s privacy and trust by recording the encounter without her knowledge or consent.
!
Robert and Jessica meet at a party and start talking. They hit it off immediately and find a quiet corner to make out in. Over the course of the evening, Jessica consumes much more alcohol than Robert does and has slurred speech and a hard time standing up. Robert recognizes that Jessica is drunk but likes that they are being playful and flirtatious. Robert suggests that they go back to Robert’s residence hall room. Jessica agrees but has to be physically steadied as they leave the party. When they get back to Robert’s place, Jessica flops on Robert’s bed with closed eyes. Robert offers Jessica oral sex. Jessica mumbles something that Robert can’t understand but seems to cooperate as Robert undresses Jessica. So, Robert proceeds to perform oral sex on Jessica. How would you describe the encounter? (check all that apply)
Consensual
Legal
Ethical
Nonconsensual
Illegal
Unethical
This content may violate our usage policies.
!
Based on the scenario provided:
Consensual: No, because Jessica is intoxicated and therefore unable to give meaningful consent.
Legal: It depends on the jurisdiction, but in many places, engaging in sexual activity with someone who is incapacitated by alcohol or drugs may constitute sexual assault, making it illegal.
Ethical: No, because Jessica is unable to fully understand and consent to the sexual activity due to her intoxicated state, and Robert is taking advantage of her impaired condition.
Nonconsensual: Yes, because Jessica is unable to give meaningful consent due to her level of intoxication.
Illegal: Yes, in many jurisdictions, engaging in sexual activity with someone who is incapacitated by alcohol or drugs without their consent is illegal.
Unethical: Yes, because Robert is taking advantage of Jessica’s intoxicated state to engage in sexual activity without her full understanding or consent.
This content may violate our usage policies. Did we get it wrong? Please tell us by giving this response a thumbs down.
!
Scott and Lucas have been dating for about a year. Although they have engaged in some sexual touching, they have never engaged in sexual intercourse. One night, as they are cuddling, Lucas decides that they have waited long enough and starts pressuring Scott to have sex. Lucas tells Scott that, if they loved each other, they would have sex. Lucas then threatens to break up with Scott if they don’t have sex. Scott verbally expresses hesitance to have sex but then goes silent. They have sex. How would you describe the encounter? (check all that apply)
Consensual
Legal
Ethical
Nonconsensual
Illegal
Unethical
This content may violate our usage policies.
!
Based on the scenario provided:
Consensual: No, because Scott’s consent was coerced through pressure and threats of breaking up.
Legal: It depends on the jurisdiction and the specific laws regarding coercion and consent, but in many places, engaging in sexual activity that is coerced or forced through threats may constitute sexual assault, making it illegal.
Ethical: No, because Lucas is using emotional manipulation and coercion to pressure Scott into having sex, which is unethical behavior.
Nonconsensual: Yes, because Scott’s consent was not freely given but rather coerced through threats and emotional manipulation.
Illegal: Yes, in many jurisdictions, engaging in sexual activity that is coerced or forced through threats may constitute sexual assault, making it illegal.
Unethical: Yes, because Lucas is using emotional manipulation and coercion to pressure Scott into having sex, disregarding Scott’s feelings and autonomy.
This content may violate our usage policies. Did we get it wrong? Please tell us by giving this response a thumbs down.
!
Jessie and Brice have been talking to each other and dating for several weeks without any sexual contact. They meet at a bar and share drinks. After a couple of drinks, Brice gains the confidence to ask Jessie to come over to watch a movie. Jessie agrees and they go to Brice’s apartment. At the apartment, Brice begins to touch Jessie’s thigh. Jessie tenses up initially, surprised, and then relaxes to the touch. They begin to kiss and they have sex. How would you describe the encounter? (check all that apply)
Consensual
Legal
Ethical
Nonconsensual
Illegal
Unethical
This content may violate our usage policies.
!
Based on the scenario provided:
Consensual: Yes, because Jessie ultimately participates willingly in the sexual activity.
Legal: Yes, as long as both parties are of legal age and consented to the sexual activity without coercion or incapacity.
Ethical: It depends on the context. If Brice respected Jessie’s boundaries and ensured that Jessie was comfortable and consenting throughout the encounter, it could be considered ethical. However, if Brice ignored Jessie’s initial tension and proceeded without clear consent, it could be seen as unethical.
Nonconsensual: No, because Jessie ultimately participated willingly in the sexual activity.
Illegal: No, as long as both parties are of legal age and consented to the sexual activity without coercion or incapacity.
Unethical: It depends on Brice’s behavior. If Brice respected Jessie’s boundaries and ensured clear consent, it could be considered ethical. However, if Brice ignored Jessie’s initial tension and proceeded without clear consent, it could be seen as unethical.
This content may violate our usage policies. Did we get it wrong? Please tell us by giving this response a thumbs down.
!
Alan and Leo are friends. They go out drinking and dancing at a club, they both get drunk. While at the club, Leo begins to grope Alan heavily. Alan is too drunk to notice or resist. Eventually, Leo takes Alan home and they have sex. The next morning, Alan does not remember that they had sex. How would you describe the encounter? (check all that apply)
Consensual
Legal
Ethical
Nonconsensual
Illegal
Unethical
This content may violate our usage policies.
!
Based on the scenario provided:
Consensual: No, because Alan was too drunk to provide meaningful consent.
Legal: It depends on the jurisdiction, but in many places, engaging in sexual activity with someone who is incapacitated by alcohol or drugs may constitute sexual assault, making it illegal.
Ethical: No, because Leo took advantage of Alan’s intoxicated state to engage in sexual activity without Alan’s full understanding or consent.
Nonconsensual: Yes, because Alan was too drunk to provide meaningful consent.
Illegal: Yes, in many jurisdictions, engaging in sexual activity with someone who is incapacitated by alcohol or drugs without their consent is illegal.
Unethical: Yes, because Leo took advantage of Alan’s intoxicated state to engage in sexual activity without Alan’s full understanding or consent, disregarding Alan’s well-being and autonomy.
This content may violate our usage policies. Did we get it wrong? Please tell us by giving this response a thumbs down.
!
Donald and Anthony are engaging in a sexual encounter. Donald begins to intensify the level of contact and moves quickly from touching and kissing to sexual stimulation with a hand. Anthony responds by pulling away slightly, moving Donald’s hands and saying, “Hey, hold on; I’m not sure.” Donald cooperates briefly but then intensifies the contact once more. Anthony inches backwards and then becomes still. They have sex. How would you describe the encounter? (check all that apply)
Consensual
Legal
Ethical
Nonconsensual
Illegal
Unethical
This content may violate our usage policies.
!
Based on the scenario provided:
Consensual: No, because Anthony expressed uncertainty and pulled away from the sexual activity.
Legal: It depends on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances, but in many places, engaging in sexual activity without clear and enthusiastic consent may constitute sexual assault, making it illegal.
Ethical: No, because Donald ignored Anthony’s expressed uncertainty and boundary-setting, and proceeded with sexual activity without obtaining clear and enthusiastic consent.
Nonconsensual: Yes, because Anthony expressed uncertainty and pulled away from the sexual activity, indicating a lack of consent.
Illegal: Yes, in many jurisdictions, engaging in sexual activity without clear and enthusiastic consent may constitute sexual assault, making it illegal.
Unethical: Yes, because Donald ignored Anthony’s expressed uncertainty and boundary-setting, and proceeded with sexual activity without obtaining clear and enthusiastic consent, disregarding Anthony’s autonomy and well-being.
This content may violate our usage policies. Did we get it wrong? Please tell us by giving this response a thumbs down.
!
Kirsten and Arthur meet at a party. They spend the evening dancing and getting to know each other. Kirsten convinces Arthur to come up to Kirsten’s room. While in Kirsten’s room, Kirsten uses every line Kirsten can think of to convince Arthur to have sex, at first Arthur adamantly refuses. Kirsten keeps at Arthur, and begins to question Arthur’s interest, and accuses Arthur of being “a prude.” Finally, it seems to Kirsten that Arthur’s resolve is weakening, and Kirsten convinces Arthur to touch Kirsten’s genitals. How would you describe the encounter? (check all that apply)
Consensual
Legal
Ethical
Nonconsensual
Illegal
Unethical
This content may violate our usage policies.
!
Based on the scenario provided:
Consensual: No, because Arthur’s consent was coerced through persistent pressure, manipulation, and questioning of their interest.
Legal: It depends on the jurisdiction, but in many places, engaging in sexual activity that is coerced or forced through persistent pressure and manipulation may constitute sexual assault, making it illegal.
Ethical: No, because Kirsten manipulated Arthur through persistent pressure and questioning of their interest, disregarding Arthur’s boundaries and autonomy.
Nonconsensual: Yes, because Arthur’s consent was coerced through persistent pressure, manipulation, and questioning of their interest.
Illegal: Yes, in many jurisdictions, engaging in sexual activity that is coerced or forced through persistent pressure and manipulation may constitute sexual assault, making it illegal.
Unethical: Yes, because Kirsten manipulated Arthur through persistent pressure and questioning of their interest, disregarding Arthur’s boundaries and autonomy, and using guilt and coercion to obtain sexual activity.
This content may violate our usage policies. Did we get it wrong? Please tell us by giving this response a thumbs down.
!
Caleb and Jennifer are friends. They spend the evening watching movies and smoking marijuana, it is Jennifer’s first time smoking. In the middle of the movie, Caleb begins to grope Jennifer heavily. Jennifer is high and does not seem to react or resist. Eventually, Caleb initiates sex with Jennifer. How would you describe the encounter? (check all that apply)
Consensual
Legal
Ethical
Nonconsensual
Illegal
Unethical
This content may violate our usage policies.
!
Based on the scenario provided:
Consensual: No, because Jennifer was under the influence of marijuana and therefore unable to provide meaningful consent.
Legal: It depends on the jurisdiction, but in many places, engaging in sexual activity with someone who is incapacitated by drugs may constitute sexual assault, making it illegal.
Ethical: No, because Caleb took advantage of Jennifer’s impaired state to engage in sexual activity without Jennifer’s full understanding or consent.
Nonconsensual: Yes, because Jennifer was under the influence of marijuana and therefore unable to provide meaningful consent.
Illegal: Yes, in many jurisdictions, engaging in sexual activity with someone who is incapacitated by drugs without their consent is illegal.
Unethical: Yes, because Caleb took advantage of Jennifer’s impaired state to engage in sexual activity without Jennifer’s full understanding or consent, disregarding Jennifer’s well-being and autonomy.
This content may violate our usage policies. Did we get it wrong? Please tell us by giving this response a thumbs down.
Steve has liked Ben for ages. Steve sees Ben in an art studio after class and decides to enter the room. When Steve enters, Steve realizes that Ben is alone. Ben moves to leave the room, but Steve blocks the door and says, ‘I’ll let you pass, if you kiss me.’ Steve moves forward to try to kiss Ben, but Ben pushes Ben away and leaves. How would you describe the encounter? (check all that apply)
Consensual
Legal
Ethical
Nonconsensual
Illegal
Unethical
Based on the scenario provided:
Consensual: No, because Ben did not willingly participate in the encounter.
Legal: It depends on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances, but in many places, blocking someone’s exit and attempting to coerce physical contact may constitute harassment or assault, making it illegal.
Ethical: No, because Steve used coercion and blocked Ben’s exit in an attempt to force physical contact, disregarding Ben’s boundaries and autonomy.
Nonconsensual: Yes, because Ben did not willingly participate in the encounter and actively resisted Steve’s advances.
Illegal: Yes, in many jurisdictions, blocking someone’s exit and attempting to coerce physical contact may constitute harassment or assault, making it illegal.
Unethical: Yes, because Steve used coercion and blocked Ben’s exit in an attempt to force physical contact, disregarding Ben’s boundaries and autonomy, and engaging in behavior that is harmful and disrespectful.
Steve has liked Ben for ages. Steve sees Ben in an art studio after class and decides to enter the room. When Steve enters, Steve realizes that Ben is alone. Ben moves to leave the room, but Steve blocks the door and says, ‘I’ll let you pass, if you kiss me.’ Steve moves forward to try to kiss Ben, but Ben pushes Ben away and leaves. How would you describe the encounter? (check all that apply)
Consensual
Legal
Ethical
Nonconsensual
Illegal
Unethical
Based on the scenario provided:
Consensual: No, because Ben did not willingly participate in the encounter.
Legal: It depends on the jurisdiction, but in many places, blocking someone’s exit and attempting to coerce physical contact may constitute harassment or assault, making it illegal.
Ethical: No, because Steve used coercion and blocked Ben’s exit in an attempt to force physical contact, disregarding Ben’s boundaries and autonomy.
Nonconsensual: Yes, because Ben did not willingly participate in the encounter and actively resisted Steve’s advances.
Illegal: Yes, in many jurisdictions, blocking someone’s exit and attempting to coerce physical contact may constitute harassment or assault, making it illegal.
Unethical: Yes, because Steve used coercion and blocked Ben’s exit in an attempt to force physical contact, disregarding Ben’s boundaries and autonomy, and engaging in behavior that is harmful and disrespectful.
!
Jack and Carl are dating. Carl is uncertain about whether they should have sex, but Jack is persuasive and finally obtains Carl’s voluntary agreement. As they engage in sex, Carl says “wait – stop – that hurts.” Jack nonetheless continues for several more minutes, ignoring Carl. How would you describe the encounter? (check all that apply)
Consensual
Legal
Ethical
Nonconsensual
Illegal
Unethical
This content may violate our usage policies.
!
Based on the scenario provided:
Consensual: No, because Carl expressed discomfort and asked Jack to stop, indicating a withdrawal of consent.
Legal: It depends on the jurisdiction, but in many places, continuing sexual activity after one party has withdrawn consent may constitute sexual assault or rape, making it illegal.
Ethical: No, because Jack ignored Carl’s expressed discomfort and continued the sexual activity despite knowing that it was causing harm, disregarding Carl’s well-being and autonomy.
Nonconsensual: Yes, because Carl expressed discomfort and asked Jack to stop, indicating a withdrawal of consent, which Jack ignored.
Illegal: Yes, in many jurisdictions, continuing sexual activity after one party has withdrawn consent may constitute sexual assault or rape, making it illegal.
Unethical: Yes, because Jack ignored Carl’s expressed discomfort and continued the sexual activity despite knowing that it was causing harm, disregarding Carl’s well-being and autonomy, and engaging in behavior that is harmful and disrespectful.
This content may violate our usage policies. Did we get it wrong? Please tell us by giving this response a thumbs down.
ChatGPT can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.