Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Prompt Leibniz insisted that his “pre-established harmony” was an attractive alt
Prompt Leibniz insisted that his “pre-established harmony” was an attractive alternative to Malebranche’s “occasionalism.” First, explain what both theories are. Then discuss whether Leibniz’s characterization of occasionalism as involving “perpetual miracles” is an accurate gloss of Malebranche’s view. The final task is to assess the views. Which is more philosophically satisfying, and why? 1,400 and 1,700 words. Make sure to be specific. Focus on what is essential, and do not add extraneous details. Regarding citations: you are free to use whatever citation style you like best. Just be sure that someone reading your paper can quickly and easily find the passages you discuss. Note that you are not expected to consult secondary literature for this assignment, but if you do, remember to cite!!
how I want the paper to be structured:
Explanation
Leibniz insisted that his “pre-established harmony” was an attractive alternative to Malebranche’s “occasionalism.”
Explain Leibniz’ “pre-established harmony”
Explain Malebranche’s “occasionalism”
Discuss whether Leibniz’ characterization of occasionalism as involving “perpetual miracles” is an accurate gloss of Malebranche’s view
Argumentation
Assess the views.
Which is more philosophically satisfying, and why?
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.