The following rubric is how I was graded on this assignment. The comments inclu

Need help with assignments?

Our qualified writers can create original, plagiarism-free papers in any format you choose (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, etc.)

Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.

Click Here To Order Now

The following rubric is how I was graded on this assignment. The comments inclu

The following rubric is how I was graded on this assignment. The comments include the revisions that need to be made. I attached the submitted assignment below. This is the turned in assignment that only needs revisions.
CriteriaProficientNeeds Improvement
Not Evident
Criterion Score
Budget: Statements
8.63 points
Selects and comprehensively defends the appropriate financial statements for use in the proposal
6.47 points
Selects and defends financial statements for use in the proposal, but statements are not appropriate or not comprehensively defended
0 points
Does not select and defend financial statements for use in the proposal
Score of Budget: Statements,
6.47 / 8.63
Criterion Feedback
Selected, but the CLINIC’S FINANCIALS ARE NOT DEFENDED!
Defense = $$$$$
Budget: Expenses
8.63 points
Accurately identifies the major expenses associated with the proposal and the budgetary accounts that would be impacted
6.47 points
Identifies the major expenses associated with the proposal and the budgetary accounts that would be impacted, but identification is not accurate
0 points
Does not identify the major expenses associated with the proposal and the budgetary accounts that would be impacted
Score of Budget: Expenses,
6.47 / 8.63
Criterion Feedback
Issues:
Budget: Budgetary Accounts
8.63 points
Identifies what budgetary accounts are impacted and clearly states how
6.47 points
Identifies what budgetary accounts are impacted but does not state how they are impacted
0 points
Does not identify which budgetary accounts are impacted or state how
Score of Budget: Budgetary Accounts,
6.47 / 8.63
Criterion Feedback
Issues:
Budget: Reasoning
8.63 points
Justifies why the selected budgetary accounts were chosen for adjustment based on analysis of previous year’s budget
6.47 points
Justifies why the selected budgetary accounts were chosen for adjustment, but not based on previous year’s budget
0 points
Does not justify why the selected budgetary accounts were chosen for adjustment
Score of Budget: Reasoning,
6.47 / 8.63
Criterion Feedback
Issue: In need of medical reasoning for the purchases.
Google: reasoning for diabetes monitoring
Results: 12,400,000
Budget: Ratios
8.63 points
Selects appropriate ratios to use for support of the proposal and justifies logically
6.47 points
Selects and justifies ratios to use for support of the proposal, but does not select appropriate ratios or justification is not logical
0 points
Does not select and justify ratios to use for support of the proposal
Score of Budget: Ratios,
8.63 / 8.63
Criterion Feedback
Excellent.
Budget: Ratio Calculations
8.63 points
Calculates the selected ratios based on the budget statement analysis
6.47 points
Calculates the selected ratios, but not based on the budgetary statement analysis
0 points
Does not calculate the selected ratios
Score of Budget: Ratio Calculations,
0 / 8.63
Criterion Feedback
Missing Calculations.
Calculations are ‘not’ the formula,
Oxford dictionary: A calculation is something that you think about and work out mathematically. Calculation is the process of working something out mathematically.
Budget: Projected Departmental Budget
8.63 points
Creates a projected budget that applies the proposed changes to the specific department
6.47 points
Creates a projected budget but is missing key elements of a departmental budget
0 points
Does not create a departmental budget applying the proposed changes to a specific department
Score of Budget: Projected Departmental Budget,
6.47 / 8.63
Criterion Feedback
Issues:
Proposal: Options
8.63 points
Provides reasonable implementation options for each proposal item
6.47 points
Provides implementation options for each proposal item, but options are not reasonable
0 points
Does not provide implementation options for each proposal item
Score of Proposal: Options,
8.63 / 8.63
Criterion Feedback
Excellent.
Proposal: Financial Research
8.63 points
Describes the cost-benefit of the listed options based on relevant research and information
6.47 points
Describes the cost-benefit of the listed options, but with gaps in relevant research and information
0 points
Does not describe the cost-benefit of the listed options
Score of Proposal: Financial Research,
6.47 / 8.63
Criterion Feedback
Cost of Options? $$$$
Proposal: Organizational Resources
8.63 points
Accurately and clearly identifies the organizational resources that will be needed for proposal implementation
6.47 points
Identifies the organizational resources that will be needed for proposal implementation, but lacks accuracy or clarity
0 points
Does not identify the organizational resources that will be needed for proposal implementation
Score of Proposal: Organizational Resources,
8.63 / 8.63
Criterion Feedback
Excellent.
Proposal: Communication
8.63 points
Proposes methods for communicating budgetary changes and communicating throughout proposal implementation to departments across the organization, and justifies the appropriateness of these methods
6.47 points
Proposes methods for communicating budgetary changes and communicating throughout proposal implementation to departments across the organization, but does not justify the appropriateness of these methods
0 points
Does not propose methods of communication for notifying departments across the organization and for proposal implementation
Score of Proposal: Communication,
8.63 / 8.63
Criterion Feedback
Excellent.
Articulation of Response
5.07 points
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
3.8025 points
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
0 points
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
Score of Articulation of Response,
5.07 / 5.07
Criterion Feedback
Excellent.
Total Score of Final Project Milestone Two: Departmental Budget and Outline Guidelines and Rubric,
78.41 / 100The following guidelines and rubric are the guidelines for the project.

Need help with assignments?

Our qualified writers can create original, plagiarism-free papers in any format you choose (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, etc.)

Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.

Click Here To Order Now